Frigate or Destroyer? Large European “Frigates” Toe the Line

130311-N-XQ474-229

A German Sachsen-class frigate.

Ship classification terminologies have always been in flux thanks to the constantly-evolving nature of naval warfare. The word “frigate” originally carried a connotation of speed and applied to ships not intended for the battle line; later, a frigate was any warship which carried its guns on a single deck, so many early ironclads were technically frigates. In modern times, surface combatant classification has centered around displacement instead of characteristics such as sail configuration or number of gun decks. In this size-based hierarchy, a frigate is a warship which is smaller than a destroyer but larger than a corvette.

During the Cold War, most frigates displaced around 2,000 to 4,000 tons at full load and were designed for escort duties. They tended to have a light armament, with point defense anti-air missiles, a small naval gun, torpedoes or depth charges, and perhaps a few surface-to-surface missiles, depending on the class. The American Knox-class frigate, for example, had a trainable launcher for eight Harpoon anti-ship missiles and/or Anti-Submarine Rockets (ASROCs) but relied on the Basic Point Defense Missile System (BPDMS), a lackluster setup which consisted of Sea Sparrow missiles and a manually aimed radar illuminator, for air defense. The British Type 21 frigate used a similar manually-guided anti-air missile system, the infamous Seacat. The Type 21 was not originally designed with any other missile systems, although it was quickly fitted with four Exocet anti-ship missiles following criticism of the design’s light armament. There were a few frigates with medium-range surface-to-air defense missiles, such as the Oliver Hazard Perry class, which was equipped with a Mk 13 rail launcher and the Standard SM-1. But, by and large, most frigates were smaller vessels lacking medium and long-range anti-air missile systems, and even classes such as the Oliver Hazard Perry had equipment substantially inferior to a contemporary guided missile destroyer.

However, as the Cold War drew to a close, surface combatant technology made considerable progress. Long-range radars became smaller and cheaper, as did the electronics needed to operate them, permitting smaller vessels to perform the air defense role. Vertical launch systems (VLS), which store missiles below decks in a ready-to-fire state instead of launching them from a rail or an above-deck box, rapidly replaced rail launchers. Vertical launch systems provide higher-density weapon storage, allowing smaller ships to carry medium and long-range air defense missiles.

Cleared for public release by Lt.Cmdr. Terry Dudley, USS Kitty Hawk Public Affairs Officer

Sailors inspect Mk 41 VLS cells to prevent water damage.

Thanks to such advances, high-end missiles and electronics could be fitted to smaller ships, spawning a new breed of multirole surface combatant. Such vessels, while classified by the navies which operate them as “frigates,” are nearly as large as a small destroyer and have remarkably similar capabilities, including the ability to perform area air defense. Examples of such frigates include the German Sachsen class, the Franco-Italian FREMM, the Spanish Álvaro de Bazán class and related Norweigan Fridtjof Nansen class, the Danish Iver Huitfeldt class, the Dutch De Zeven Provinciën class, the Russian Gorshkov class, and others. Many of these ships are the most powerful surface combatants in their respective navies. As this list suggests, the practice of commissioning frigates with destroyer-like capabilities is largely a continental European phenomenon — many of the aforementioned ships would be classified as destroyers if operated by a non-European navy.

Bazan

An Álvaro de Bazán-class frigate. Image by Hammersfan.

Take, for example, the Spanish Álvaro de Bazán-class frigate. The class boasts a full-size AN/SPY-1D air search radar, the exact same radar used aboard American Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Its primary armament is a 48-cell Mk 41 VLS, also used aboard Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which is compatible with a wide variety of American air defense, surface-to-surface, and anti-submarine missiles. The biggest difference between the Bazán class and the Burke class is the latter’s greater number of VLS cells — 90-96 vs. 48. If you compare the Álvaro de Bazán class to a smaller destroyer such as the British Type 45, the firepower discrepancy vanishes, with both ships having 48 VLS cells.

incheon

An Incheon-class frigate underway.

However, smaller, more specialized frigates have not yet died out. South Korea’s Incheon-class frigate, a ~3,000-ton coastal defense class designed for the unique needs of the ROK Navy, illustrates this. It has a large Mk 45 Mod 4 naval gun and four Cheon Ryong land-attack cruise missiles, allowing it to conduct naval gunfire bombardments along the coast and strike shore targets in North Korea with precision. The class’s eight SSM-700K missiles offer potent anti-ship capabilities, and its facilities for a medium helicopter grant formidable anti-submarine prowess for a ship of its size. However, its anti-air armament is a single 21-round Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) launcher, which has a paltry range of less than 5 nmi. Compared to the aforementioned multirole frigates, the Incheon class is smaller, cheaper, and optimized for a specific role — land attack.

One of the reasons ships are given descriptors such as “destroyer” and “frigate” is to serve as a heuristic for quick analysis. When told that a ship is a destroyer, one has a rough idea of its capabilities without needing to dig into the specifics. However, it is not possible to make such assumptions with regards to frigates — there are such a diversity of frigate displacements and capabilities that closer examination is essential to get a sense of the role and capabilities of each individual class.

This is far from an ideal state of affairs, but there is no real alternative. Ships are classified by the navies which commission them, and, for the sake of consistency and clarity, everyone uses the given classification. As such, naval enthusiasts and analysts should recognize the diversity of frigates and be vigilant when considering frigate types with which they may not be familiar.

Be the first to comment on "Frigate or Destroyer? Large European “Frigates” Toe the Line"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*